CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce G210M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce G210M
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
NVIDIA GeForce G210M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 512MB VRAM GeForce G210M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1520 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
+8443%
4.101 TFLOPS
GeForce G210M
0.048 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
VS
GeForce G210M
Graphics Card
Apr 2019
Release Date
Jun 2009
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1335 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
16
96
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
64.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.500 GPixel/s
128.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.000 GTexel/s
8.202 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.101 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.00 GFLOPS
128.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GT218
-
GPU Variant
N10M-GS
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
14W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.7
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R9 M365X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
3
AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
6
NVIDIA GeForce MX450 30.5W 10Gbps vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730A
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy