NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon HD 8750M

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q AMD Radeon HD 8750M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q and 1024MB VRAM Radeon HD 8750M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q 's Advantages

Released 6 years and 2 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 62% (1335MHz vs 825MHz)

More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q +547%

4.101 TFLOPS

Radeon HD 8750M

0.633 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q

VS

Radeon HD 8750M

Graphics Card

Apr 2019

Release Date

Feb 2013

GeForce 16 Mobile

Generation

Solar System

Mobile

Type

Mobile

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz

Base Clock

775 MHz

1335 MHz

Boost Clock

825 MHz

1500 MHz

Memory Clock

900 MHz

Memory

6GB

Memory Size

1024MB

GDDR6

Memory Type

DDR3

192bit

Memory Bus

128bit

288.0GB/s

Bandwidth

28.80GB/s

Render Config

24

SM Count

-

Compute Units

6

1536

Shading Units

384

96

TMUs

24

48

ROPs

8

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

16 KB (per CU)

1536 KB

L2 Cache

256 KB

Theoretical Performance

64.08 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

6.600 GPixel/s

128.2 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

19.80 GTexel/s

8.202 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

4.101 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

633.6 GFLOPS

128.2 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

39.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU116

GPU Name

Mars

-

GPU Variant

Mars S3 XT (216-0842018)

Turing

Architecture

GCN 1.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

28 nm

6.6 billion

Transistors

0.95 billion

284 mm²

Die Size

77 mm²

Board Design

Unknown

TDP

Unknown

-

Suggested PSU

-

Portable Device Dependent

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

None

Power Connectors

-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 (11_1)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

2.1 (1.2)

1.3

Vulkan

1.2.170

7.5

CUDA

-

6.7

Shader Model

6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 720A

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon HD 8970M

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2400

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon HD 8550M

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD FirePro S4000X

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon R5 M315

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 805A

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max Q vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X

Related News

1

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

2

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

3

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

4

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

5

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

6

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

7

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

8

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

9

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance

10

Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports