Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon E9260 MXM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon E9260 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9260 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1590MHz vs 1200MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile +127%
4.884 TFLOPS
Radeon E9260 MXM
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2019
Release Date
Sep 2016
GeForce 16 Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1455 MHz
Base Clock
1090 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
14
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
896
96
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

76.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
152.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.60 GTexel/s
9.769 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.150 TFLOPS
4.884 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
152.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
134.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU116
GPU Name
Baffin
-
GPU Variant
Baffin PRO
Turing
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
3 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy