NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
1296 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (120W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
+667%
5.437 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
512bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
30
1536
Shading Units
240
96
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
84.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
169.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
10.87 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.437 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
169.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
204W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GT200B
TU116-400-A1
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
