CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
1296 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (120W vs 204W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
+667%
5.437 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
VS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
512bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
240
96
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
84.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
169.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
10.87 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.437 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
169.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GT200B
TU116-400-A1
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
120W
TDP
204W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
3
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs ATI Radeon X1550 AGP
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs ATI Radeon HD 5770 X2
Related News
1
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
2
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
3
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
4
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
5
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
6
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
7
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
8
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
9
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
10
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy