CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 192.4GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (120W vs 244W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
+243%
5.437 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
1.581 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
VS
GeForce GTX 580 Rev. 2
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Jun 2011
GeForce 16
Generation
GeForce 500
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.4GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
512
96
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
84.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.70 GPixel/s
169.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
49.41 GTexel/s
10.87 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.437 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.581 TFLOPS
169.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
197.6 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GF110
TU116-400-A1
GPU Variant
GF110-380-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
3 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Board Design
120W
TDP
244W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Intel UHD Graphics 620
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon HD 6530
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 455 OEM
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy