CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA NVS 510
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA NVS 510
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA NVS 510
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and 2GB VRAM NVS 510 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
+1676%
5.437 TFLOPS
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
+2400%
125
NVS 510
5
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
VS
NVS 510
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Oct 2012
GeForce 16
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
192
96
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
84.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.188 GPixel/s
169.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.75 GTexel/s
10.87 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.437 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
306.0 GFLOPS
169.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
12.75 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
GK107
TU116-400-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Board Design
120W
TDP
35W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
4
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
6
AMD Radeon RX 6600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs ATI Radeon HD 4700
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy