CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon R7 250
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon R7 250
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
AMD Radeon R7 250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660
+601%
5.027 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250
0.717 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1660
VS
Radeon R7 250
Graphics Card
Mar 2019
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 16
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
-
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.1GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
22
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
1408
Shading Units
512
88
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
716.8 GFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.80 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Cape Verde
TU116-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Board Design
120W
TDP
55W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GP104
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon RX 580
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 610
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8 GB GA104
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs NVIDIA P102 101
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy