Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XT

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 6800 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
216 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Sep 2005
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 6 AGP
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
216
Shading Units
-
72
TMUs
12
28
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.400 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
NV42
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
6800 XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Curie
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
110 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.202 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
222 mm²

Board Design

171W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x Molex

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
3.3
OpenGL
2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy