Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 384MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 384GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
120 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 +103%
0.536 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GS
0.264 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
384MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
192bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
12
-
Compute Units
-
216
Shading Units
96
72
TMUs
48
28
ROPs
12
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
264.0 GFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G92
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
G92-150-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

171W
TDP
105W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy