Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9500 GS to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 16.13GB/s)
184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 +509%
0.536 TFLOPS
GeForce 9500 GS
0.088 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jul 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
504 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
16.13GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
216
Shading Units
32
72
TMUs
16
28
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
88.00 GFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G96
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
G96-259-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Board Design

171W
TDP
40W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy