NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 625 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages

Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 13.20GB/s)

168 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM 's Advantages

Released 4 years and 3 months late

More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)

Lower TDP (29W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 +219%

0.536 TFLOPS

GeForce GT 625 OEM

0.168 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

VS

GeForce GT 625 OEM

Graphics Card

Nov 2008

Release Date

Feb 2013

GeForce 200

Generation

GeForce 600

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 2.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

-

Boost Clock

-

999 MHz

Memory Clock

825 MHz

Memory

896MB

Memory Size

1024MB

GDDR3

Memory Type

DDR3

448bit

Memory Bus

64bit

111.9GB/s

Bandwidth

13.20GB/s

Render Config

27

SM Count

1

-

Compute Units

-

216

Shading Units

48

72

TMUs

8

28

ROPs

4

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

-

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

224 KB

L2 Cache

128 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

1.748 GPixel/s

41.47 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

6.992 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

-

536.5 GFLOPS

FP32 (float)

167.8 GFLOPS

67.07 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

13.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B

GPU Name

GF119

G200-103-B2

GPU Variant

-

Tesla 2.0

Architecture

Fermi 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

55 nm

Process Size

40 nm

1.4 billion

Transistors

0.292 billion

470 mm²

Die Size

79 mm²

Board Design

171W

TDP

29W

450 W

Suggested PSU

200 W

2x DVI 1x S-Video

Outputs

1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a

2x 6-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)

DirectX

12 (11_0)

3.3

OpenGL

4.6

1.1

OpenCL

1.1

N/A

Vulkan

N/A

1.3

CUDA

2.1

4.0

Shader Model

5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

1

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

2

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3

5

AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition

Related News

1

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

2

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

3

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

4

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

5

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

6

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

7

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

8

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

9

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

10

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W