CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 1536MB VRAM GeForce GTX 660 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 OEM 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock888MHz
More VRAM (1536GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (134.4GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
936 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 171W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 660 OEM
+281%
2.046 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
VS
GeForce GTX 660 OEM
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Aug 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
823 MHz
-
Boost Clock
888 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
192bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
134.4GB/s
Render Config
27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
216
Shading Units
1152
72
TMUs
96
28
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
224 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.31 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.25 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.046 TFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.25 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GK104
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
GK104-200-KD-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Board Design
171W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
2
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
5
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA NVS 315
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon X550 XT
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy