CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 250W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2088 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780
+675%
4.156 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
VS
GeForce GTX 780
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
May 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
863 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s
Render Config
27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
216
Shading Units
2304
72
TMUs
192
28
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
224 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
43.30 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
173.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.156 TFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
173.2 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GK110
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
GK110-300-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Board Design
171W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
2
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2
4
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
6
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 3750
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI FirePro V5700
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA NVS 510
Related News
1
Only 3 Weeks Left! AMD Zen5 Launching Soon
2
Ilya Departs OpenAI to Launch New Company Aiming at Superintelligence!
3
Comprehensive Overview of AMD Ryzen 9000 Zen5 Desktop CPUs
4
Intel May Increase Base Frequencies for Arrow Lake-S / H / HX, High-End Chips to Reach 3GHz or Higher
5
It's 2024: This Company Released a Laptop Supporting DOS and Windows 95
6
AMD's Strix Halo Supports Up to 128GB Memory, Clearly Designed for AI Large Language Models
7
AMD to Launch Advanced Ryzen AI PRO Series Soon
8
Intel Delays Lunar Lake Shipment: Postponed from June to September
9
Initial Test Results of AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 Revealed: IPC Improvement Meets Expectations
10
Elon Musk Responds to Nvidia’s Jensen Huang: Humanoid Robots Will Be Ten Times More Common than Cars
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy