NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 's Advantages

Released 15 years and 3 months late

Boost Clock1470MHz

Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)

2088 additional rendering cores

Lower TDP (70W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

0.536 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB +1163%

6.774 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

VS

GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB

Graphics Card

Nov 2008

Release Date

Feb 2024

GeForce 200

Generation

GeForce 30

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 2.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1042 MHz

-

Boost Clock

1470 MHz

999 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

896MB

Memory Size

6GB

GDDR3

Memory Type

GDDR6

448bit

Memory Bus

96bit

111.9GB/s

Bandwidth

168.0GB/s

Render Config

27

SM Count

18

-

Compute Units

-

216

Shading Units

2304

72

TMUs

72

28

ROPs

32

-

Tensor Cores

72

-

RT Cores

18

-

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

224 KB

L2 Cache

2 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

47.04 GPixel/s

41.47 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

105.8 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

6.774 TFLOPS

536.5 GFLOPS

FP32 (float)

6.774 TFLOPS

67.07 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

105.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B

GPU Name

GA107

G200-103-B2

GPU Variant

GA107-325-K2-A1

Tesla 2.0

Architecture

Ampere

TSMC

Foundry

Samsung

55 nm

Process Size

8 nm

1.4 billion

Transistors

8.7 billion

470 mm²

Die Size

200 mm²

Board Design

171W

TDP

70W

450 W

Suggested PSU

250 W

2x DVI 1x S-Video

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a

2x 6-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

3.3

OpenGL

4.6

1.1

OpenCL

3.0

N/A

Vulkan

1.3

CUDA

8.6

4.0

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

2

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

3

NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

4

AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2

6

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

7

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 5570 OEM

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4350 PCI

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM

Related News

1

Noctua Announce NH-D15 G2 Air Cooler and NF-A14x25r G2 Fan

2

The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation

3

Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits

4

Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU

5

Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4

6

AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds

7

Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory

8

AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2

9

AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future

10

Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs