Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4700

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
ATI Radeon HD 4700 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 3 months late
104 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 +39%
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4700
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Feb 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
4
216
Shading Units
320
72
TMUs
32
28
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
RV730
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
RV730 CE
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Board Design

171W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy