Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4860

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4860

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4860 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
ATI Radeon HD 4860 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
424 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4860 +67%
0.896 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Sep 2009
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
216
Shading Units
640
72
TMUs
32
28
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
896.0 GFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
179.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
RV790
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
RV790 GT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.959 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
282 mm²

Board Design

171W
TDP
130W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy