CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 7970 X2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 7970 X2
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon HD 7970 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 7970 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon HD 7970 X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1832 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 7970 X2
+606%
3.789 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
VS
Radeon HD 7970 X2
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Aug 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
Southern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s
Render Config
27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
32
216
Shading Units
2048
72
TMUs
128
28
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
118.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.789 TFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
947.2 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
New Zealand
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²
Board Design
171W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
2
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2
4
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
5
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
6
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 8760 OEM
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO
Related News
1
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
2
NVIDIA to Ramp Up Orders and Add New Suppliers to Meet Explosive Demand for Blackwell Products
3
NVIDIA Informs Brands of Reduced Supply for RTX 40 Series GPUs
4
Only 3 Weeks Left! AMD Zen5 Launching Soon
5
Ilya Departs OpenAI to Launch New Company Aiming at Superintelligence!
6
Comprehensive Overview of AMD Ryzen 9000 Zen5 Desktop CPUs
7
Intel May Increase Base Frequencies for Arrow Lake-S / H / HX, High-End Chips to Reach 3GHz or Higher
8
It's 2024: This Company Released a Laptop Supporting DOS and Windows 95
9
AMD's Strix Halo Supports Up to 128GB Memory, Clearly Designed for AI Large Language Models
10
AMD to Launch Advanced Ryzen AI PRO Series Soon
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy