CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
AMD Radeon Pro W6400
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
552 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 171W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400
+567%
3.58 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
VS
Radeon Pro W6400
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s
Render Config
27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
12
216
Shading Units
768
72
TMUs
48
28
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
224 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
Navi 24
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Board Design
171W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
Related GPU Comparisons
1
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
2
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
3
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
4
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Liquid Cooling vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
5
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 Limited Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
7
AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 390X
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD FirePro W5000
Related News
1
Apple's 2025 OS in Development: iOS 19 Codename 'Luck'
2
Apple's AI is Memory Hungry! The Entire iPhone 16 Lineup Comes with 8GB RAM
3
Noctua Announce NH-D15 G2 Air Cooler and NF-A14x25r G2 Fan
4
The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation
5
Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits
6
Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU
7
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
8
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
9
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
10
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy