Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
552 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400 +567%
3.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
12
216
Shading Units
768
72
TMUs
48
28
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
224 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Navi 24
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Board Design

171W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy