Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA TITAN V

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA TITAN V

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
VS
NVIDIA TITAN V
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 NVIDIA TITAN V
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 and 12GB VRAM TITAN V to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (171W vs 250W)
NVIDIA TITAN V 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (651.3GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
4904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
TITAN V +2679%
14.9 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
VS
TITAN V

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Dec 2017
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
848 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
448bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
651.3GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
216
Shading Units
5120
72
TMUs
320
28
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
96 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
0 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.7 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
465.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.80 TFLOPS
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.90 TFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.450 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GV100
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
GV100-400-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

171W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.0
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon X1950 XTX Uber Edition
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB GA107
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 7950 Monica BIOS 1
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 GDDR5X
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB GP104
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon RX 5300
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 6850 1440SP Edition

Related News

1
The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation
2
Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits
3
Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU
4
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
5
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
6
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
7
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
8
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
9
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
10
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy