Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 130 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 24.00GB/s)
168 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 +346%
0.536 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 130 OEM
0.12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Mar 2009
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
448bit
Memory Bus
192bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
24.00GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
6
-
Compute Units
-
216
Shading Units
48
72
TMUs
24
28
ROPs
12
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
48 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.000 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
120.0 GFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
G94B
G200-103-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²

Board Design

182W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy