NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs Moore Threads MTT S4000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and 48GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 450W)
Moore Threads MTT S4000 's Advantages
More VRAM (48GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
7976 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S4000
+4485%
24.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
27
SM Count
-
216
Shading Units
8192
72
TMUs
512
28
ROPs
512
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
768.0 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
768.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
49.15 TFLOPS
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
24.58 TFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
384.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
182W
TDP
450W
450 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
G200-103-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
22 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5
