NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

VS

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages

Lower TDP (182W vs 300W)

AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages

Released 12 years and 11 months late

Boost Clock2150MHz

Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)

4904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

0.536 TFLOPS

Radeon Pro W6900X +4008%

22.02 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

VS

Radeon Pro W6900X

Graphics Card

Sep 2008

Release Date

Aug 2021

GeForce 200

Generation

Radeon Pro Mac

Desktop

Type

Desktop

PCIe 2.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-

Base Clock

1825 MHz

-

Boost Clock

2150 MHz

999 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz

Memory

896MB

Memory Size

32GB

GDDR3

Memory Type

GDDR6

448bit

Memory Bus

256bit

111.9GB/s

Bandwidth

512.0GB/s

Render Config

27

SM Count

-

Compute Units

80

216

Shading Units

5120

72

TMUs

320

28

ROPs

128

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

80

-

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

224 KB

L2 Cache

4 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

275.2 GPixel/s

41.47 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

688.0 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

44.03 TFLOPS

536.5 GFLOPS

FP32 (float)

22.02 TFLOPS

67.07 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

1376 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200

GPU Name

Navi 21

G200-103-A2

GPU Variant

Navi 21 Pro-XTA

Tesla 2.0

Architecture

RDNA 2.0

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

65 nm

Process Size

7 nm

1.4 billion

Transistors

26.8 billion

576 mm²

Die Size

520 mm²

Board Design

182W

TDP

300W

450 W

Suggested PSU

700 W

2x DVI 1x S-Video

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt

2x 6-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

3.3

OpenGL

4.6

1.1

OpenCL

2.1

N/A

Vulkan

1.3

CUDA

-

4.0

Shader Model

6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon RX 7700

2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 8860 OEM

3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 6790

4

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI FirePro V7900

5

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI Radeon X1950 GT

6

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI Radeon HD 4670 X2

7

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 2

8

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

9

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon RX 560X

10

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 6290

Related News

1

AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds

2

Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory

3

AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2

4

AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future

5

Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs

6

TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion

7

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time

8

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

9

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

10

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage