Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 250X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
424 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250X +126%
1.216 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Feb 2014
GeForce 200
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
216
Shading Units
640
72
TMUs
40
28
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.20 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1216 GFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Cape Verde
G200-103-A2
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

182W
TDP
80W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy