CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon R7 250X
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
AMD Radeon R7 250X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 72.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 250X 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 896GB)
424 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 182W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250X
+126%
1.216 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
Radeon R7 250X
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Feb 2014
GeForce 200
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
216
Shading Units
640
72
TMUs
40
28
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
15.20 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1216 GFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.00 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT200
GPU Name
Cape Verde
G200-103-A2
GPU Variant
Cape Verde XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Board Design
182W
TDP
80W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
2
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 6790
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI FirePro V7900
5
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 8860 OEM
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon RX 7700
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 LE
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI FireGL V7600
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
2
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
3
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
4
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
5
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
6
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
7
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
8
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
9
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
10
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy