CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3880 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 182W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega Nano
+2261%
12.66 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
VS
Radeon RX Vega Nano
Graphics Card
Sep 2008
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1247 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1546 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
448bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
409.6GB/s
Render Config
27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
216
Shading Units
4096
72
TMUs
256
28
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.94 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
395.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.66 TFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
791.6 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GT200
GPU Name
Vega 10
G200-103-A2
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Board Design
182W
TDP
175W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
2
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 6790
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs ATI FirePro V7900
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon HD 8860 OEM
6
NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GSO vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon RX 7700
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon Sky 700
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs MTT S70
Related News
1
Noctua Announce NH-D15 G2 Air Cooler and NF-A14x25r G2 Fan
2
The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation
3
Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits
4
Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU
5
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
6
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
7
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
8
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
9
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
10
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy