Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock1546MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3880 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (175W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega Nano +2261%
12.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2008
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1247 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1546 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
448bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
409.6GB/s

Render Config

27
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
64
216
Shading Units
4096
72
TMUs
256
28
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.94 GPixel/s
41.47 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
395.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
536.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.66 TFLOPS
67.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
791.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200
GPU Name
Vega 10
G200-103-A2
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
576 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Board Design

182W
TDP
175W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy