Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1032MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.2GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (134W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost +281%
1.585 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Mar 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
980 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1032 MHz
1008 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
192bit
112.9GB/s
Bandwidth
144.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
64
28
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
224 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.51 GPixel/s
33.15 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.05 GTexel/s
-
-
-
414.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.585 TFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
66.05 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
134W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK106
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
GK106-240-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy