Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 360

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs AMD Radeon R7 360

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.9GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1792GB)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360 +288%
1.613 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Jun 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1008 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.9GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
33.15 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
414.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Tobago
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy