Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 280X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1792MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 OEM and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 112.9GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 OEM
0.415 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X +886%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
850 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1008 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

1792MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
112.9GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
33.15 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
414.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
51.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Tahiti
G200-103-B2
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy