Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
152 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 +1390%
0.477 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
40
64
TMUs
4
28
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

182W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
RV620
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy