Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs ATI FirePro V3800

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs ATI FirePro V3800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
208 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (43W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800 +9%
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
400
64
TMUs
20
28
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

182W
TDP
43W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Redwood
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy