Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 +430%
0.477 TFLOPS
GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 3
0.09 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Jul 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
4
192
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
28
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
89.60 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

182W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G96C
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
G96-300-C1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy