Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD FirePro V5900

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900 +28%
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
32
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Cayman
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy