Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD FirePro W9000

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD FirePro W9000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 6GB VRAM FirePro W9000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro W9000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
FirePro W9000 +737%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 200
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
998.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
274W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Tahiti
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
Tahiti XT GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy