Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD FireStream 9170

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD FireStream 9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 8 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
AMD FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (105W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
FireStream 9170 +4%
0.497 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
16
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
105W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
RV670
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy