Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4850 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 63.68GB/s)
Lower TDP (182W vs 250W)
ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 's Advantages
608 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4850 X2 +109%
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
995 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
63.68GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
800
64
TMUs
40
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
R700
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
R700 PRO (215-0669065)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy