Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD FireStream 9350

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD FireStream 9350

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1248 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
FireStream 9350 +322%
2.016 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 200
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
18
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1440
64
TMUs
72
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Cypress
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.4
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy