Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 896SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
704 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (85W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360 896SP +313%
1.971 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Jun 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
14
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
85W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Tobago
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
Tobago XT
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy