Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 3GB VRAM Radeon HD 8990 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon HD 8990 OEM 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 8990 OEM +758%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Apr 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
Sea Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
375W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Malta
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
Malta XT (215-0849026)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
365 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy