Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM Iris Plus Graphics 655 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1050MHz
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (15W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
Iris Plus Graphics 655 +68%
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Apr 2018
GeForce 200
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Desktop
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
System Shared
GDDR3
Memory Type
System Shared
448bit
Memory Bus
System Shared
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

24
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
192
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
48
28
ROPs
6
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.300 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.613 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
201.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Coffee Lake GT3e
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 9.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm+++
1.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
470 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

182W
TDP
15W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy