Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W5500 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1855MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5500 +995%
5.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Feb 2020
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1744 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1855 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
22
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1408
64
TMUs
88
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.36 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.45 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.224 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
326.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
125W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Navi 14
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy