Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6600 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6600 +1838%
9.247 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Jun 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2580 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
28
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
28
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
224 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
L3 Cache
32 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
165.1 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
289.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.49 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.247 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
577.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Navi 23
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
11.06 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
237 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy