Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro W5700X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 205W)
AMD Radeon Pro W5700X 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W5700X +2088%
10.44 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Dec 2019
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1243 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
160
28
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
130.6 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
326.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
20.89 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.44 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
652.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
205W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Navi 10
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
10.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
251 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy