Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 's Advantages
Released 11 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (65W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3200 +247%
1.658 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Jul 2019
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
32
28
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.72 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.658 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.658 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
103.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Polaris 23
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
Polaris 23 XT GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
55 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy