Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240 +4%
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 200
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
20
28
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

182W
TDP
30W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Oland
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy