Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 265X OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 265X OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock925MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 265X OEM +396%
2.368 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 200
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1400 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
179.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1280
64
TMUs
80
28
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
74.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.368 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Curacao
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy