Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (182W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
3392 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2
0.477 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY +1402%
7.168 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Jul 2015
GeForce 200
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM
448bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
56
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
3584
64
TMUs
224
28
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
224 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
224.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.168 TFLOPS
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.168 TFLOPS
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
448.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

182W
TDP
275W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Fiji
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
Fiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy