Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs 3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 and 16MB VRAM Voodoo4 2 4200 PCI 16 MB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 's Advantages
More VRAM (896GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 2.656GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 PCI 16 MB 's Advantages
Lower TDP (15W vs 182W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2008
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 200
Generation
Voodoo4-2
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 4x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
999 MHz
Memory Clock
166 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
16MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR
448bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
2.656GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
2
28
ROPs
2
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.0 MPixel/s
36.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.0 MTexel/s
-
-
-
476.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
59.62 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

182W
TDP
15W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
VSA-101
G200-103-B3
GPU Variant
Daytona (355-0025-221)
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Voodoo Scalable
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
180 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.014 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
112 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
6.0
3.3
OpenGL
1.1
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy