Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 56 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 210W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1250MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
3472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
0.308 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 56 +2809%
8.96 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Aug 2017
GeForce 200M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1138 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1250 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
786 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
402.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
56
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
3584
56
TMUs
224
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
80.00 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
280.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
17.92 TFLOPS
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.960 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
560.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
210W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Vega 10
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XL (215-0894216)
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy