Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs AMD Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260M vs AMD Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1021MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (100.4GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
0.308 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition +409%
1.568 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 200M
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1021 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1568 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
100.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
768
56
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.34 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
49.01 GTexel/s
-
-
-
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.568 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
98.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

G92
GPU Name
Strato
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
Strato PRO
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy