CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2900 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (127.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 219W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
+115%
0.622 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2900 GT
0.288 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
VS
Radeon HD 2900 GT
Graphics Card
Feb 2010
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 200
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
448bit
Memory Bus
256bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
3
240
Shading Units
240
80
TMUs
12
28
ROPs
12
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
224 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.212 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.212 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
288.5 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
G92B
GPU Name
R600
G92-421-B1
GPU Variant
R600 GT (215RGFDKA13FG)
Tesla
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
260 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Board Design
219W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 6700S
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 550X 640SP
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 TiM
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 460 1024SP
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs AMD Radeon Pro V420
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA GeForce 510 OEM
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs NVIDIA P104 100
Related News
1
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
2
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
3
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
4
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
5
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
6
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
7
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
8
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
9
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
10
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy