Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 275 and 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 's Advantages
Lower TDP (219W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 127.0GB/s)
16656 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 275
0.674 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +9110%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2024
GeForce 200
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1665 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
1134 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

896MB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
448bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
127.0GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
132
240
Shading Units
16896
80
TMUs
528
28
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
50.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
673.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
84.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Board Design

219W
TDP
1000W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GB100
G200-105-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
208 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
9.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy